Oil-based liquid crystals are widespread. A thorough understanding of their properties is behind the displays found in most computer monitors, televisions, and smartphones.
Water-based liquid crystals are less well understood, nevertheless their inherent biocompatibility makes them a potential candidate for a variety of biological and medical applications.
New research from physicists at the University of Pennsylvania and Swarthmore College have advanced the field’s understanding of this class of materials, demonstrating never-before-seen configurations by confining a water-based liquid crystal in a cylinder.
Achiral Liquid Crystals
These liquid crystals are achiral, meaning they don’t have an intrinsic left- or right-handedness, but when placed in a cylinder they self-assemble into helical structures that have either left- or right-handed twists. Furthermore, when two structures with different handedness meet in the cylinder, a new type of defect interrupts the regular liquid crystal pattern.
On the microscopic level, the rod-like molecular structures that make up the water-based liquid crystals twist more easily than oil-based liquid crystals.
This unusual elastic property is the key feature that makes the chiral helices possible. It differs from more common ways that helical structures are made to form, namely, by adding or using molecules that are themselves chiral.
“Ultimately, our hope is that we can bring liquid crystal technology closer to biology. To do that we need to better understand the kinds of structures water-based liquid crystals can make. Liquid crystals are a venerable field, and some of the chiral structures we observed are new kinds of configurations and defects that have never been seen over its long history,”
said professor Arjun Yodh, who worked on the study.
Lyotropic Chromonic Liquid Crystals
The type of liquid crystals the researchers investigated in this study are so-called lyotropic chromonic liquid crystals, or LCLCs.
The LCLCs used here were organic salts commonly known as “Sunset Yellow” or “Yellow 6,” a widely used food dye found in orange soda, cheese-flavored snacks and many other products.
When placed in water, individual molecules of the dye stack up like poker chips, forming microscopic rods that then assemble into more complex phases with long-range orientational order.
The research was led by postdoctoral fellow Joonwoo Jeong and graduate students Zoey Davidson and Louis Kang, working closely with professors Arjun Yodh and Tom Lubensky at Penn and Peter Collings, a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Swarthmore.
In an earlier study, the research team demonstrated the behavior of LCLCs when they were confined in spherical drops. In that case, the rods want to align with each other as well as with the walls of the sphere, but they have an increasingly difficult time doing so as they approach the poles.
“Liquid crystals have three modes of elastic deformations: splay, bend and twist,” Jeong said. “With these liquid crystals, the resistance to twisting is very low. Splaying costs a lot of energy when the rods reach the defect, which is like the cowlick formed by the hair on your scalp, at the bottom or the top of the sphere, and so they relieve that stress by twisting relative to each other.
In the cylinder, however, there is no equivalent of the cowlick-defect at the poles of the sphere. It essentially stretches out infinitely. We asked what happens when there aren’t any boundaries in one direction and when the rods must lie perpendicular to the cylinder’s inner surfaces?”
Escaped Radial Configuration
When placed in a hollow glass tube, oil-based liquid crystals with a similar perpendicular orientation at the surface form a configuration known as “escaped radial” because the orientational order seems to be “escaping” in a series of concentric funnels pointing in one direction or another.
The researchers tried the same kind of experiments with water-based liquid crystals by coating the inside of a tube with a polymer-based substance and then filling it with water and LCLCs. The LCLCs did stick to the edges in the same perpendicular way.
But, because their resistance to twisting is so low, the escape radial funnels they made had a distinct rotation to them, like the vortex of a tornado.
“To describe the system before, we just needed to know which way the crystals were escaping, say east or west,” Collings said. “Now, we have to know east or west plus which way it’s rotating, left or right. It’s a much richer system.”
After the chiral helices formed, the experimenters heated the system, sending the individual molecular rods into random alignment. They then let the sample cool into the aligned state, permitting the formation of the most energetically favorable alignments.
New In The Zoo
However, because the starting conditions for this process were random, different parts of the sample made either left- or right-twisting helices, and when regions with one-handedness and escape direction encountered regions with different handedness or escape direction, then a new class of defects was found.
“We’re adding new members to the zoo of liquid crystal defects,”
said Lubensky.
Surprisingly, defects never form where the escape directions of the neighboring domains differed but their handedness is the same.
“And if you wait even longer,” Yodh said, “the configurations on the wall change, too, so that it becomes favorable to form a double-helix. We think this is due to the reorientation of the liquid crystals on the wall, but we need to study it more.”
Future experiments could look at whether it is possible to force these helices to form with a particular handedness or direction, which could be an important part of developing applications for them.
References:
Chiral structures from achiral liquid crystals in cylindrical capillaries
Joonwoo Jeong, Louis Kang, Zoey S. Davidson, Peter J. Collings, Tom C. Lubensky, and A. G. Yodh
PNAS March 30, 2015 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423220112
Chiral symmetry breaking and surface faceting in chromonic liquid crystal droplets with giant elastic anisotropy
Joonwoo Jeong, Louis Kang, Zoey S. Davidson, Peter J. Collings, Tom C. Lubensky, and A. G. Yodh
PNAS February 4, 2014 vol. 111 no. 5 1742-1747 10.1073/pnas.1315121111
